Roald Dahl and the Giant Miscalculation

Discuss or chat on any topic not covered by above forums.
ONLY Registered Forum Members have access to this Forum.
Post Reply
User avatar
Stephen Whiteside
Posts: 3784
Joined: Sat Nov 27, 2010 1:07 pm
Contact:

Roald Dahl and the Giant Miscalculation

Post by Stephen Whiteside » Wed Jan 09, 2013 2:51 pm

I read today that scientists have proved Roald Dahl made a grave miscalculation in his book "James and the Giant Peach".

Dahl claimed 500 seagulls carried the peach across the ocean, but it would in fact have taken more like 2.5 million.

It got me thinking.

How many albatros for a giant apricot?
How many cormorants for a giant cherry?
How many nightjars for a giant nectarine?

Perhaps the gulls would have been better sticking to grapes, and they should have got pelicans for the peach.

Alliteration rules!
Stephen Whiteside, Australian Poet and Writer
http://www.stephenwhiteside.com.au

Neville Briggs
Posts: 6946
Joined: Sun Oct 31, 2010 12:08 pm
Location: Here

Re: Roald Dahl and the Giant Miscalculation

Post by Neville Briggs » Wed Jan 09, 2013 3:54 pm

Roald Dahl's work is a work of imagination, what scientists calculate is irrelevant. How does one calculate imagination ? :)

I have a copy of the small volume called " Boy " which is Dahl's autobiography of his boyhood. It's a fascinating read, I thought.

One of the most interesting aspects is how much of his boyhood experiences were later translated into elements of his stories.

I think that should be of interest to writers like bush poets.

Dahl didn't just relate his boyhood experiences as they had happened. He translated or wove them into part of his invented world of literary imagination.
For example, his school was near the Cadbury's chocolate factory. Roald Dahl and his fellow students were given free samples of the chocolates and paid a small sum to
fill out a survey on their preferences ( a marketing survey to target childrens tastes )
Obviously this experience led to the creation of Charlie and the Chocolate Factory.

I think Stephen, that you do indeed follow that way of making personal experiences as sort of prompts for creative work. That's what you have done on this thread. I think ?

Just my opinion, for what it's worth ( not much :roll: ) I think we poets should be very aware of those possibilities.

Sorry to steal the thread. You sowed a big thought in my head.
Neville
" Prose is description, poetry is presence " Les Murray.

User avatar
Stephen Whiteside
Posts: 3784
Joined: Sat Nov 27, 2010 1:07 pm
Contact:

Re: Roald Dahl and the Giant Miscalculation

Post by Stephen Whiteside » Wed Jan 09, 2013 4:02 pm

I'm glad, Neville.
Stephen Whiteside, Australian Poet and Writer
http://www.stephenwhiteside.com.au

User avatar
Maureen K Clifford
Posts: 8097
Joined: Tue Nov 09, 2010 10:31 am
Location: Ipswich - Paul Pisasale country and home of the Ipswich Poetry Feast
Contact:

Re: Roald Dahl and the Giant Miscalculation

Post by Maureen K Clifford » Wed Jan 09, 2013 4:56 pm

and everyone knows seagulls wouldn't have carried a peach anyway Neville it would have been fish and chips :lol: :lol: :lol:
Check out The Scribbly Bark Poets blog site here -
http://scribblybarkpoetry.blogspot.com.au/


I may not always succeed in making a difference, but I will go to my grave knowing I at least tried.

Neville Briggs
Posts: 6946
Joined: Sun Oct 31, 2010 12:08 pm
Location: Here

Re: Roald Dahl and the Giant Miscalculation

Post by Neville Briggs » Thu Jan 10, 2013 8:38 am

That's it Maureen :lol: they are vicious things too, those gulls.
Neville
" Prose is description, poetry is presence " Les Murray.

Post Reply