Henry Lawson on the Australian "Bush"

Discussion of any bush poetry topic.
ONLY Registered Forum Members have access to this Forum.
Post Reply
manfredvijars

Henry Lawson on the Australian "Bush"

Post by manfredvijars » Sat Oct 06, 2012 9:29 am

Henry Lawson on the Australian "Bush"


SOME POPULAR AUSTRALIAN MISTAKES {published in The Bulletin, 1893}

1. An Australian mirage does not look like water; it looks too dry and dusty.

2. A plain is not neessarily a wide, open space covered with waving grass or green sward, like a prairie (the prairie isn't necessarily that way either, but that's an American mistake, not an Australian one); it is either a desert or a stretch of level country covered withwretched scrub.

3. A river is not a broad, shining stream with green banks and tall, dense eucalypti walls; it is more often a string of muddy water-holes - "a chain of dry water-holes", someone said.

4. There are no "mountains" out West; only ridges on the floors of hell.

5. There are no forests; only mongrel scrubs.

6. Australian poetical writers invariably get the coastal scenery mixed up with that of "Out Back".

7. An Australian Western homestead is not an old-fashioned, gable-ended, brickand-shingle buildingwith avenues and parks; and the squatter doesn't live there, either. A Western station, at best, is a collection of slab and galvanised-iron sheds and humpies, and is the hottest, driest, dustiest, and most God-forsaken hole you could think of; the nanager lives there - when compelled to do so.

8. The manager is not called the "super"; he is called the "overseer" - which name fits him better.

9. Station-hands are not noble, romantic fellows; they are mostly crawlers to the boss - which they have to be. Shearers - the men of the West - despise station-hands.

10. Men tramping in search of a "shed" are not called "sundowners" or "swaggies"; they are "trav'lers".

11. A swag is not generally referred to as a "bluey" or "Matilda" - it is called a "swag".

12. No bushman thinks of "going on the wallaby" or "walking Matilda", or "padding the hoof"; he goes on the track - when forced to it.

13. You do not "hunp bluey" - you simply "carry your swag".

14. You do not stow grub - you "have some tucker, mate".

15. (Item for our Alstralian artists). A traveller rarely, if ever, carries a stick; it suggests a common suburban loafer, back-yards, clothes-lines, roosting fowls, watchdogs, blind men, sewer-pipes, and goats eating turnip-parings.

16. (For artists). No traveller out back carries a horse-collar swag - it's too hot; and the swag is not carried by a strap passed round the chest but round one shoulder. The nose (tucker) blg hangs over the other shoulder and balances the load nicely - when there's anythng in the bag.

17. It's not glorious and grand and free to be on the track. Try it.

18. A shearing-shed is not what city people picture it to be - if they imagine it at all; it is perhaps the most degrading hell on the face of this earth. Ask any better-class shearer.

19. An Australian lake is not a lake; it is either a sheet of brackish water or a patch of dry sand.

20. Least said about shanties the better.

{p. 25} 21. The poetical bushman does not exist; the majority of the men out back now are from the cities. The real native our-back bushman is narrow-minded, densely ignorant, invulnerarably thick-headed. How could he be otherwise?

22. The blackfellow is a fraud. A white man can learn to throw the boomerang as well as an aborigine - even better. A blackfellow is not to be depended on with regard to direction, distance, or weather. A blackfellow once offered to take us to better water than that at which we were camping. He said it was only half-a-mile. We rolled up our swags and followed him and his gin five miles through the scrub to a mud-hole with a dead bullock in it. Also, he said that it would rain that night; and it didn't rain there for six months. Moreover, he threw a boomerang at a rabbit and lamed one of his dogs - of which he had about 150.

23, etc. Half the bushmen are not called "Bill", nor the other half "Jim". We knew a shearer whose name was Reginald! Jim doesn't tell pathetic yarns in bad doggerel in a shearer's hut - if he did, the men would tap their foreheads and wink.

In conclusion. We wish to Heaven that Australian writers would leave off trying to make a paradise out of the Out Back Hell; if only out of consideration for the poor, hopeless, half-starved wretches who carry swags through it and look in vain for work - and ask in vain for tucker very often. What's the good of making a heaven of a hell when by describing it as it really is we might do some good for the lost souls there?

1893 Bulletin

Heather

Re: Henry Lawson on the Australian "Bush"

Post by Heather » Sat Oct 06, 2012 10:07 am

That's brilliant Manfred. Having just read the book on how Waltzing Matilda was written, I found 11. interesting.

Gives an insight into the Lawson's outback experience and his poetry.

Heather :)

Rimeriter

Re: Henry Lawson on the Australian "Bush"

Post by Rimeriter » Sat Oct 06, 2012 3:29 pm

In the modern day and age, travelling as can be done in mostly safety and comfort,
I must say that I have savoured and enjoyed every trip.

In contrast -
Refer - To Hell and High Water : Walking in the footsteps of Henry Lawson by Gregory Bryan.
He and a compatriot traverse Bourke and back via Hungerford.

A few of our members recently trekked somewhere in the area.
Some anecdotes would be enlightening !!
Jim.

Neville Briggs
Posts: 6946
Joined: Sun Oct 31, 2010 12:08 pm
Location: Here

Re: Henry Lawson on the Australian "Bush"

Post by Neville Briggs » Sat Oct 06, 2012 4:14 pm

:lol: :lol: :lol: That's wonderful Manfred. I like no. 17 :lol:
Neville
" Prose is description, poetry is presence " Les Murray.

Post Reply