Page 3 of 4

Re: Poems by John Peel

Posted: Sat Jun 11, 2011 3:45 pm
by Heather
You are a champion John! :D

Re: Poems by John Peel

Posted: Sat Jun 11, 2011 3:47 pm
by Peely
G'day Heather

You are most welcome.

Regards


John Peel

Re: Poems by John Peel

Posted: Sat Jun 11, 2011 3:49 pm
by Heather
And you're quick!

Re: Poems by John Peel

Posted: Sat Jun 11, 2011 4:12 pm
by Bob Pacey
If poems listed are to be accessable on this forum only why do we have Bush Verse Forum poems on the list ?

Bob Bewildered.

Re: Poems by John Peel

Posted: Sat Jun 11, 2011 4:14 pm
by Heather
Left over from a previous post Booobbooo! (prior to this index being invented!)

Re: Poems by John Peel

Posted: Sat Jun 11, 2011 4:56 pm
by manfredvijars
Bob Pacey wrote:If poems listed are to be accessable on this forum only why do we have Bush Verse Forum poems on the list ?

Bob Bewildered.

I think they missed the instructions - glasses all fogged up perhaps ??? ... :D

Re: Poems by John Peel

Posted: Sat Jun 11, 2011 5:09 pm
by Bob Pacey
Thats why I asked if they were ignoring you Manny ?

Lot of work for no gain I reckon.

Bob

Re: Poems by John Peel

Posted: Sat Jun 11, 2011 5:13 pm
by manfredvijars
(I know) ... ahh, the light should come on soon ... After all, we're 'self' regulating here ... :shock:

Re: Poems by John Peel

Posted: Sat Jun 11, 2011 6:02 pm
by Peely
G'day Bob

The Bushverse poems were on my list because I only moved the posts from where they were previously this morning. As this is a new section, I hadn't seen the new rule (which hadn't been decided when I did the lists up in the previous section). I will remove the bushverse references, but will post poems from over there onto here so that people can view and comment. I will fix the links up after I do the transfer (easier to find the poems by making use of the links).

Regards


John Peel

Re: Poems by John Peel

Posted: Sat Jun 11, 2011 9:05 pm
by manfredvijars
No worries John, actually added that section - with rules, when I saw there were three 'Index' postings (yours included). Just seemed to make sense keeping it 'inhouse' ... but I'll take that on advisement ...