Yes Matt.. words (and assembling them) are magic! well said!! precisely.
The joy of words, written and spoken, and what coalesces from them.
Word-works such as fiction, poetry, lyrics, speeches. Within those groups such as fiction, of course there are sub-groups all co-existing. Science fiction, romance, mystery, historical novels. Diversity.
Words... joined up and arranged in many different ways that give pleasure to people.
.. but naturally, consumer Tastes are different.
A work of fiction that someone raves about, "Oh, you simply MUST read that book" may be un-appealing to another. We have all been there I think... "I will lend you this novel ... you will love it." We are all guilty of that..?
Same with music in its many forms. Now I have a big vinyl collection and you will not find one classical record there. It is not my TASTE in music. I have a relative who always has loud classical music playing to the point of distraction. She denigrates my musical affinities, and subtly attempts to force Beethoven's Fifth on me. Volume up.
Now this is when we get into dicey waters.
Snobbery... as Glenny mentioned. Elitism in a way. The belief that one is so correct in poetic areas that there is no room to understand that TASTE is individual. Dangerous stuff. Like opinions... there is only one right one and that's mine. Same with religion I guess.. and art, and politics too. TASTE.
I joined FAW looking for fellow-travellers in poetry, only to find it dominated by one particular area of poetry that was not at all to my liking or comprehension. I scanned their journal to find some rhyme. Nothing. I also used to scan the Age newspaper "Literary" supplement for rhyme. Nothing. Some fellowship, I thought.
I am trying the ABPA as a common-interest poetry group because as an appreciation-society it offers (I think) a strict adherence to balladry... the sheer discipline of rhyme and meter and words that are skillfully strung together to make simple sense and entertain. Purity. Bush poetry. Balladry. RHYME. METER. Discipline and skill in writing... using those tough game-rules. Lawson, Paterson. NOT a cryptic crossword, or an intellectual challenge. Acceptance of and respect for the varying skill levels of writing too... encouragement to those who love that style of writing and TRY. All that is MY THING.
Now I had no particular fight with the FAW advocates of free verse.... until one of their senior intellectuals, as a publicly-paid judge and who represented (spoke on behalf of!) the Arts Minister of Victoria who in turn reports to the Premier... publicly called Henry Lawson "a drunkard". (I did not see that judge's portrait on Australian's ten-dollar note btw). They fraudulently called their Award the C.J. Dennis Literary Award.
An unprovoked literary attack does not come any worse than that surely? "A drunkard". You do not have to be a Rhodes scholar to figure out the implications of that statement for aspiring Rhyming Poets. Bush Balladists.
Those trumped-up lackeys who travelled using the credentials of great poets such as C.J. Dennis while stabbing them in the back at the same time received my total contempt then. Not unreasonably some might say.?
From then on life changed for me. Lines were drawn.
I had no hesitation in equally verballising my contempt for Free Verse. No fear. Just as others can feel free to espouse its virtues, and criticise rhyming poetry. At a Bush Verse prize-giving ceremony I overheard a gentleman from the Henry Lawson Society say "Free Verse is like playing tennis without a net." Brilliant.
Like music, even in Bush Poetry one acclaimed poem may not be particularly liked by others. Hey, that's life.
It may well be that as David says one has to plough through scores of bush poems ... but honestly, it is finding a real GEM that is the reward for that forebearance. It can be so worth it.
I am a Bush Poet. That is why I am here.
The elegant feature of "Bush" Verse is that I am NOT challenged to understand its meaning and I have no desire to be. I suggest that like 99% of the population, I want to read for enjoyment. Not be challenged.
There is no common ground between free verse and bush poetry. None. No middle ground.
David Campbell's quotes ..."shod with love" and "failure's miles guard wisdom's inch", "a corner made from a straight line". I simply do not understand any of that, and what I do not understand I tend to suspect is humbug. There you are! Said. But then I have never claimed to be an intellectual... just a simple fellow..a bush poet and no more.
A Singer Of The Bush... of the people I love.
SUMMARY :
So Literature and Music.... many different forms that give pleasure.
A poem, as David Campbell I think implies is not automatically good because it is "bush" or rhymes. It may well be that there is a lot of "ploughing through" to do...
When we enjoy something, naturally it is difficult at times not to understand why others would not love what we Adore. In My Opinion one can acknowledge that we have differing tastes without having to lie about seeing virtues in poems where we see none, just to feel part of some crowd, or be otherwise intimidated into being untruthful. Like "The Emperor Who Wore No Clothes" .... call it as it is. If it is unfathomable nonsense or just a collection of buzz-words.. then be unafraid and call it rubbish.
In a perfect world we can say we don't like something and leave it there. Forums tend to encourage more than that. The Why's. Free speech. I don't like free verse because.... Robust and Good. Humour too.
From the rich and extensive English language you can hang together words... but I love them hung with rhyme and meter and sense and occasionally good humour. Skill. Great Stuff.. and yes UNBEATABLE too.
If free verse gives some people pleasure then that's good. Just that it does nothing for me. As I have said before, some of it only makes any sense after a few beers or when you read it from end to start, backwards, which reflects no great credit on the author of the piece.
Henry Lawson was not a drunkard... he was first and foremost a Literary GIANT .... an awesome guy. If he was ever a drunkard it was only a hobby... part-time thing you know. If I stood alone to defend him, where others would not or lacked the spine to do so, then that was ... No Problem at all
![Smile :)](./images/smilies/icon_e_smile.gif)