Judges of the Secret Court
Posted: Sat Dec 08, 2012 1:50 pm
I saw a comment on here about the Ipswich poetry competition in which the judge, after the event was concluded, was referred to as Manfred X.
Not only am I a puzzled about why anyone should want to be apparently coy about naming a bush poetry judge after the event ( after all , it's obvious who is being referred to) but I am also puzzled as to why the names of judges are not known when the entries are called for.
We have strict rules about anonymity for the entries as they are being judged. Why on earth must the judge be unknown ?
There are several poetry competitions around Australia, where I have seen the name of the judge or judges given on the entry form. ( e.g. Blake Prize for Poety )
Why not, where's the problem ?
The only objection might be, that people could write work that they are sure will appeal to a particular person. I think that is a poor argument. That argument is a slur on the integrity of our poetry judges, surely. And as well as that, who could possibly tell what judges find appealing on the day ? And I note that the judges in performance comps are known beforehand !
I think that we should consider publishing beforehand, the names of judges in written bush poetry competitions. Anonymous judges seems a secret squirrel thing that smacks of distrust and I think, puts a bit of a wet blanket on the enjoyment of vying in competitions.
Not only am I a puzzled about why anyone should want to be apparently coy about naming a bush poetry judge after the event ( after all , it's obvious who is being referred to) but I am also puzzled as to why the names of judges are not known when the entries are called for.
We have strict rules about anonymity for the entries as they are being judged. Why on earth must the judge be unknown ?
There are several poetry competitions around Australia, where I have seen the name of the judge or judges given on the entry form. ( e.g. Blake Prize for Poety )
Why not, where's the problem ?
The only objection might be, that people could write work that they are sure will appeal to a particular person. I think that is a poor argument. That argument is a slur on the integrity of our poetry judges, surely. And as well as that, who could possibly tell what judges find appealing on the day ? And I note that the judges in performance comps are known beforehand !
I think that we should consider publishing beforehand, the names of judges in written bush poetry competitions. Anonymous judges seems a secret squirrel thing that smacks of distrust and I think, puts a bit of a wet blanket on the enjoyment of vying in competitions.