Competitions and 'previous winners'

Discussion of any bush poetry topic.
ONLY Registered Forum Members have access to this Forum.
User avatar
Stephen Whiteside
Posts: 3784
Joined: Sat Nov 27, 2010 1:07 pm
Contact:

Re: Competitions and 'previous winners'

Post by Stephen Whiteside » Thu Dec 13, 2012 5:09 pm

Just a discussion, Matt. Sorry.
Stephen Whiteside, Australian Poet and Writer
http://www.stephenwhiteside.com.au

Heather

Re: Competitions and 'previous winners'

Post by Heather » Thu Dec 13, 2012 7:11 pm

And what is the "perfect" poem...? ;)

Neville Briggs
Posts: 6946
Joined: Sun Oct 31, 2010 12:08 pm
Location: Here

Re: Competitions and 'previous winners'

Post by Neville Briggs » Thu Dec 13, 2012 7:16 pm

One that is complete, Heather ;)

Jonanthan Richardson said of the words for the perfect poem, " Fewer would not have served the turn, more would have been superfluous " :geek:
Neville
" Prose is description, poetry is presence " Les Murray.

User avatar
Stephen Whiteside
Posts: 3784
Joined: Sat Nov 27, 2010 1:07 pm
Contact:

Re: Competitions and 'previous winners'

Post by Stephen Whiteside » Fri Dec 14, 2012 5:41 am

There's no such thing as a perfect poem. There's no such thing as a perfect anything. "Perfection" is an abstraction, nothing more.
Stephen Whiteside, Australian Poet and Writer
http://www.stephenwhiteside.com.au

warooa

Re: Competitions and 'previous winners'

Post by warooa » Fri Dec 14, 2012 5:52 am

That's a pretty perfect explanation as to what perfect means :|

User avatar
Stephen Whiteside
Posts: 3784
Joined: Sat Nov 27, 2010 1:07 pm
Contact:

Re: Competitions and 'previous winners'

Post by Stephen Whiteside » Fri Dec 14, 2012 8:04 am

Now hang on there a minute, Marty. I'm not going to let you get away with that! If my explanation is perfect, remembering that a written explanation is a physical reality, then my explanation of perfection, stating it can never be a physical reality, is deeply flawed. You're a clever bugger, aren't you? (And the day is still so young...)
Stephen Whiteside, Australian Poet and Writer
http://www.stephenwhiteside.com.au

User avatar
Maureen K Clifford
Posts: 8175
Joined: Tue Nov 09, 2010 10:31 am
Location: Ipswich - Paul Pisasale country and home of the Ipswich Poetry Feast
Contact:

Re: Competitions and 'previous winners'

Post by Maureen K Clifford » Fri Dec 14, 2012 11:41 am

I sometimes think our Marty has razor blades for brekkie - he is so sharp :lol: :lol: :lol: and quick off the mark as well. Sign of a very active brain and a quick wit methinks. 8-)
Check out The Scribbly Bark Poets blog site here -
http://scribblybarkpoetry.blogspot.com.au/


I may not always succeed in making a difference, but I will go to my grave knowing I at least tried.

User avatar
Stephen Whiteside
Posts: 3784
Joined: Sat Nov 27, 2010 1:07 pm
Contact:

Re: Competitions and 'previous winners'

Post by Stephen Whiteside » Fri Dec 14, 2012 12:40 pm

Which Marty, Maureen?
Stephen Whiteside, Australian Poet and Writer
http://www.stephenwhiteside.com.au

Kym

Re: Competitions and 'previous winners'

Post by Kym » Sat Dec 15, 2012 5:59 am

Getting back to the original topic of previous winners being able to be re-used ... I'm all for the idea. I think it's sad that once a poem has won something, it has to be put in the "useless" pile, when a poem that keeps winning 2nd, 3rd, HC, 2nd, 2nd can just keep putting it's author's name on the winner's list, when it isn't even the best poem the author has written! Yet IT keeps getting the attention, and the goodie gets ignored ... sad, huh?

How about a poem can win, say, three times before it is regarded as "finished with". That way, it really gets to prove that it is a good poem before being put to bed. After spending hours/days working on a poem, you want to be able to use it for more than one comp, I reckon.

Well, that's my opinion ... not that that's worth much ...

See ya later,

Kym.

User avatar
Bob Pacey
Moderator
Posts: 7479
Joined: Thu Dec 02, 2010 9:18 am
Location: Yeppoon

Re: Competitions and 'previous winners'

Post by Bob Pacey » Sat Dec 15, 2012 6:27 am

Now Kym since when has your opinion not been valued ?


The anonymity thing seems to be the biggest stunbling block as I see it. Would knowing who wrote the poem influence a judge ?

I really do not know but I write so little now that if I ever write a gem and it WON I would like to think that it could be entered into numerous competitions.

Cheers Bob
The purpose in life is to have fun.
After you grasp that everything else seems insignificant !!!

Post Reply